By that standard, a physician who does anything to a patient without first verifying that that thing is safe is behaving in an irresponsible manner. ATang 12:36, (EDT) Sorry, but you miss a vital element in the Hippocratic Oath: Never bring harm upon anyone. I'd like to see the actual report from Judicial Watch that the news article was referring to though since the news article itself did not cite it, I find the entire Telegraph article suspect. For now, the bullet stands, following a proper critical reading of the source.- TerryH Talk 22:14, (EDT) Fletcher and Oakley - from the patient advocacy group, and a GP, respectively - simply stated that the effects of the vaccine on adolescents are unknown - meaning they themselves haven't established the link purported in this article. The over-reliance on vaccination for the avoidance of diseases best avoided by other means will probably be the subject of an Essay someday. And you would have seen dissenting opinions, from a patient advocacy group and from a general practitioner who expressed grave doubts about the applicability to adolescent girls of a safety study conducted on adult women. If you had read the article further down, you would have seen that the article writer was improperly accepting as two-plus-two-equals-four-level fact the boilerplate from the manufacturer and from the health authority, each of whom has an ax to grind. The source cited for the connection between Gardisil and deaths explicitly states that no connection has been proven. Discover "the truth behind Gulf War Syndrome"? A website like that shouldn't be trusted, let alone used as a source. The website itself is a promotion for subscribing to a paid newsletter it has "points" that says why vaccine is bad - but no logical evidence to back it up. Parts of the paragraph that used the Blaylock Wellness Report as a source is very questionable. 5 Vaccines and sexually transmitted disease.But you also have to eliminate glutamate from the diet. The answer to this problem seems to be blocking the glutaminase enzyme, as that prevents the cells from manufacturing glutamate. Terminal cancer patients lose a great deal of muscle and become emaciated (cancer cachexia) because the tumors steal the glutamine from their muscles in massive amounts. The highest concentration of glutamine in the body is found in muscles. Research has shown that inhibiting this enzyme slows cancer growth. Inside cells, glutamine is converted into glutamate by the enzyme glutaminase. While a ketogenic diet has powerful anticancer effects, high glutamate foods should be excluded from that diet. Unfortunately, cancer patients are rarely told that they should avoid foods naturally high in glutamate and glutamine, and processed foods containing powerful glutamate additives, such as MSG, whey protein, hydrolyzed protein, soy protein, caseinate, natural flavors, carrageenan, and autolyzed yeast.įoods naturally high in glutamate include all meats, fish, many cheeses, green peas, all soy products, beans, tomatoes (especially pureed or as a sauce), and many salad dressings, as well as milk and milk products. Most diets, even those advocated by cancer center dietitians, contain high levels of glutamate, glutamine, and sugar.
Blocking glutamate receptors has been shown to inhibit the growth and invasion of these tumors and greatly enhance the effectiveness of conventional treatments. Some cancers, such as melanomas and medulloblastomas, have very high numbers of glutamate receptors. The list of cancers that have been shown to have glutamate receptors include: Within cancer cells, glutamine is converted into another amino acid called glutamate, which is used for energy production and to stimulate receptors on the cancer cell membrane, triggering increased proliferation of cancer cells and invasion into surrounding tissues. In fact, some tumors are voracious glutamine consumers. It turns out that they can use the amino acid glutamine just as efficiently as they use glucose. (Normal cells use a different process called the electron transport system.) Glucose is the main fuel for cancers, and therefore all carbohydrates feed cancers.īut cancer cells have other fuels. Mainly, this is because they use a process called aerobic glycolysis for energy.